duminică, 30 septembrie 2012

Can cough syrup help me conceive ?

"Can cough syrup help me conceive ?"


 


While there's not a lot of medical research to support this idea, anecdotal evidence suggests that it can help. But there are a few caveats, too. One ingredient in certain cough syrups — guaifenesin — can help you get pregnant by thinning your cervical fluid, which enables sperm to travel through your cervix and fertilize an egg. If you know from taking your temperature every morning that you're ovulating, but you don't seem to be producing much wet, slippery, cervical fluid, guaifenesin might be all the help you need to get pregnant. This is the paradox, though: You need to know when you're approaching ovulation to take advantage of this recommendation, and the only way to know that is by checking your cervical fluid. So guaifenesin works best on women who do produce at least some cervical fluid.

How does it work? Guaifenesin, a common ingredient in cough syrups, is an "expectorant." That is, it relieves congestion by helping liquefy mucus in your lungs, allowing you to cough it up. And because it works systemically on all mucous membranes in your body, it can make your cervical fluid wetter, too.

The trick is to find a cough syrup in which guaifenesin is the only active ingredient, so check labels carefully. Many cough and cold medicines contain antihistamines that also work systemically in your body but have the reverse effect: They dry up mucus and diminish wet cervical fluid. And while you're trying to get pregnant, there's no reason to expose yourself to any other drugs unnecessarily, so find a product that contains only guaifenesin and no other active ingredients, including dextromethorphan (a cough suppressant) and alcohol. Humibid LA — the pill form of guaifenesin, available by prescription — is a safe choice. Ask your healthcare provider to prescribe it for you.

If you're taking the liquid form of guaifenesin, take 2 teaspoons three times a day around the time of month you're expecting to ovulate. If you're taking the pill form (Humibid LA), take it as prescribed for a cold. Either way, I would encourage you to take it from the first day you notice any type of wetness through the day of your temperature shift. That may be about a week. (Editor's note: If you're not yet charting your basal body temperature, click here for more information on how to do it.)

Guaifenesin may even work for women who've had abnormal cervical cells frozen off or who've had a cone biopsy — the removal of a cone-shaped wedge of the cervix to treat lesions that may be precancerous. This procedure destroys some of the cervical crypts that produce fluid. If this is what's behind your low production of cervical fluid, taking guaifenesin might help you produce enough wet, slippery fluid through the remaining cervical crypts to help you get pregnant.

joi, 20 septembrie 2012

Frequently Asked Questions about Coffee



  • How to brew the ultimate drink




    1. What is the best temperature to brew coffee?


      According to chemical studies, the optimal water temperature for drip coffee is 95-98C. According to my notes, colder water doesn't extract enough caffeine/essential oils from the beans, and above such temperature the acidity increases wildly.


      Return to Index




    2. Quality of coffee


      The quality of a brew depends on the following factors (in no particular order):



      1. Time since grinding the beans.

      2. Time since roasting.

      3. Cleanliness with brewing equipment.

      4. Bean quality (what crop, etc.).

      5. Water quality.


      Fact: Unless you are buying some major debris, bean quality is not very important, as compared to 1-3 and 5.


      Fact: A coffee can in the supermarket often contains major debris, so be careful when you choose. (See note below).


      Fact: Once you have freshly roasted and ground coffee, filtered water and equipment free of oil residues from the last brew, quality of beans makes a huge difference.


      NOTE: A coffee can in the supermarket often contains a blend of Arabica and robusta beans while most coffee houses sell only arabica beans. Arabica beans are usually flavor rich, while robusta beans have more caffeine, less flavor and are cheaper to produce.


      When you buy coffee, whether in a coffee house or in a supermarket, you want to get 100% arabica, except for espresso blends, which may be a combination of both. My personal experience says that a 100% arabica espresso blend is better but many people (including many Italians) will disagree on this point, so go with what you like.


      For freshness, in a coffee house it is better to buy popular blends that move fast, while in a supermarket vacuum packaged containers with expiration date are your best bet.

      Chances are you will not get truly fresh coffee in a supermarket. This is an absolute fact if it is pre-ground. In a coffee house look for a shop that roasts in-house and ask what was roasted that day. If the person behind the counter does not know, ask to talk to someone who cares about coffee. If no one knows, go somewhere else. As a side note, it should be mentioned that coffee is at its best after 12-24 hours, so you might be interested in day-old coffee as well if you plan to brew the same day. Also, grind your own coffee. Buying fresh and then having it ground defeats the purpose. Ground coffee only lasts a few hours or one day tops.


      Return to Index




    3. What is the difference between arabica and robusta?


      Arabica beans and robusta beans are two different species of coffee. They are the primary species of coffee that find their way into the American cup. The general differences are those of taste, and the conditions under which the two species differ in production.

      Taste:
      Arabicas have a wider taste range, between varieties. They range in taste from sweet-soft to sharp-tangy. Their unroasted smell is sometimes likened to blueberries. Their roasted smell is perfumey with fruity notes and sugary tones.
      Robustas taste range is neutral to harsh and they are often described as tasting grain-like, oatmeally. Their unroasted smell is often described as raw-peanutty. Their roasted smell is often likened to burnt rubber.

      Production Conditions:
      Arabicas are delicate, they require cool tropical climates, lots of moisture, rich soil, shade and sun. They are subject to attack from various pests, and are extremely vulnerable to cold and bad handling.
      Robustas are hardier plants, capable of growing well at low altitudes, less subject to problems related to pests and rough handling. They yield more pounds of finished goods per acre at a lower cost of production.

      Economics:
      Customs and trade, supply and demand over the course of the last 150 years has determined the relative values of arabica vs. robusta beans. Generally speaking, the best coffees are all arabicas and the highest quality blends are pure arabica blends. They are also the priciest.
      In the U.S. you will generally find arabicas in the coffee store and specialty food shop, and robustas in the supermarket cans and jars of instant.
      In Italy, home of espresso, the very highest quality brands are pure arabica, and like here, the popular-priced goods are blended with robusta beans. Because "Imported from Italy" can make an ordinary supermarket quality Italian espresso a "gourmet" coffee in the U.S., you will find robustas in some Italian brands offered for sale in the United States.
      The coffee you like is a very personal thing. You may find that you really prefer the all-arabica blends, or you may feel comfortable with something less, just because you like it. That's OK. The American marketplace, thanks to the Specialty Coffee movement here, is now rich enough in roast types, species, varieties, blends, brews, grinds, and price points to have something for every taste and pocketbook.
      Return to Index




    4. Just how much ground coffee do I need for x amount of coffee?


      a. Whatever seems right to you.


      b. It may change slightly from coffee to coffee and according to freshness.


      c. What the Specialty Coffee Association of America (SCAA) has to say:
      A cup is defined as 6 ounces of water before brewing. This will produce 5.33 ounces of brewed coffee. Or 125 ml & 110 ml for Euro style coffee makers
      The SCAA defines 10 grams or .36 oz per cup as the proper measure for brewed coffee if using the American standards. If using Euro standards the measure is 7 grams per 125 ml.
      To further confuse things I will add a few more measures:
      3.75 oz per 1/2 gallon
      55 grams per liter
      2.25 gallons per 1 lb.
      If you want to know more check the SCAA's web page at www.scaa.com.


      d. According to "The Coffee Lover's Companion" by Diana Rosen, the standard is 2 tbs. per 6 oz of water. This to me seems very high but I have never tried it.


      e. My personal taste is 1 "standard measure" per cup of coffee. A standard measure is approximately 1 tbs. this is a plus or minus equation depending on the coffee I am using, the degree of roast (darker = more coffee due to weight loss to keep the same weight per ounce) and the coffeepot I am brewing in. I believe this should be approximately in line with the SCAA's advice.


      Return to Index




    Preparation Methods



      1. Drip


    Drip is the most common form of coffee served in the United States. This method essentially pours near-boiling water over medium-course coffee grounds to produce coffee. This is probably the easiest method of making coffee. A few words about filters: There are two types of filter available for drip coffee. One type is paper. The other is a metal or plastic permanent filter. Neither is innately better but they do produce different coffee flavors. A paper filter will hold some of the essential oils that are being released from the coffee. Some people have a preference for this. In paper filters there are several brands that have various thickness and types of paper that will absorb more or less of the oils. One selling point for paper filters is that they are very easy to clean up; just throw them away. This of course means more landfill and more trees being cut down. Some people also feel that paper filters give coffee a papery taste. The permanent filter has some obvious advantages and disadvantages in relation to paper. I will add just a couple of  ideas about them here. One, use metal; plastic won't last as long and may give your coffee an off flavor. Two, permanent filters require a slightly courser grind and you may get some sediment in your cup. This is probably comparable to the sediment in a coffee press.


    Return to Index



      1. Press Pot aka French Press aka Cafetiere aka Bodum


    A French press is a glass container with a wire mesh attached to a plunger. To make coffee, you first allow water to come very close to a boil but just short of this point. If you are heating water in an open pan, when you see the very beginning of a boil, pull your water. The overall temperature of the water from top to bottom should even out to be in the ideal range for coffee. If you are using a closed tea pot, this is the point where the water just begins to sound different in the pot. For more information on temperature see the section on water temperature. The press should be pre-warmed before putting the coffee in. This will help keep the glass from absorbing as much heat when the hot water is put in the press thus making for warmer coffee when you pour. The press should contain approximately the same amount of very coarsely ground coffee as you would use for drip coffee. Let it rest for 2-3 minutes or until it is easy to press the plunger down and then plunge the wire mesh. This filters the coffee. Course ground coffee is a must here or there will be a great deal of sediment in the cup. You will have a small amount of sediment no mater what. Due to the fact that there is no paper filter, all oils make it into the cup. This is a great cup of coffee.


    Return to Index



      1. Espresso


    See the Home Espresso Machine Mini-FAQ by David Bogie at http://www.islandnet.com/coffee/faq.html for info on espresso. Also check the info in this file under the recipe section.


    Return to Index



      1. Vacuum


    This is a method I have never experienced so if someone who has first-hand experience wants to redo this, let me know. The buildup of steam in the lower bowl forces the water up into the funnel, where it mixes with the ground coffee. A quick stir wets the grounds into the water, and a small amount of water left behind in the bowl keeps the steam coming and the temperature constant. Brewing continues for 2 minutes (it can go longer but you don't get any more flavor) and we then take the siphon off the hotplate. With no more steam being produced, a vacuum forms in the bowl, which sucks the brewed coffee down through the filter.I hear this gives a great cup of coffee and is quite fun to watch.
    Cona (the original) in England, Hario in Japan, and Yama Glass in Taiwan and Bodum make vacuum pots. Corey & Silex used to make them in the U.S. and Sunbeam also made a metal model with built-in heating.


    Return to Index



      1. Percolator


    Percolators violate most of the natural laws about brewing coffee.




        • Don't over extract the oils and flavor. Percolators work by taking coffee and reheating it and throwing it over the grounds over and over and over again.

        • Never reheat/boil coffee. This destroys the flavor. For best flavor, boil the water, pass it over the grounds and retain the heat. Don't reheat it.



    Violating these rules may not sound like much, but these are about the only rules there are. The effect of a percolator is to keep passing boiling water/coffee over the grounds until there is no flavor left and the flavor in the coffee is so dead that it's a worthless waste.


    Return to Index



      1. Ibrik


    This is being worked on now. Check the next version.


    Return to Index


    Peripherals and Secondary Storage




    1. Proper care of coffee makers...


      It is very important that you wash your coffee maker pot and filter container thoroughly at least once a week. Bitter oils stick to the glass container and plastic filter holder.


      I used to wash the plastic filter container and rinse the glass pot. Coffee started to taste bad. When I was told to wash both thoroughly with plenty of soap the flavor improved instantly. Note: To the naked eye rinsed and soap washed pots look the same (clean that is).


      Another trick is every time you use your coffeepot, unless you are making another pot right away, put a couple of drops of liquid dishwashing detergent in the pot and run hot water into the pot. Let this sit on the counter till you need it again, rinse and you are ready to go. This does not replace the weekly or twice-weekly washing but helps keep it cleaner between washings.


      Some drip coffee makers require periodic cleansing with a solution of water and vinegar.


      If you have a coffee/teapot, the inside of which is stained with oily brown residues - also plastic/metal coffee filters, tea strainers, and stainless steel sinks in caffeine-o-phile houses - they can be restored to a shining, brand-spanking-new state by washing in hot washing powder (detergent).


      Get a large plastic jug, add 2 or 3 heaped tablespoons of Daz Automatic or Bold or whatever, and about a pint of hot water - just off the boil is the best.


      Swill the jug around until the detergent is dissolved, and then pour into tea/coffeepot, and let it stand for 5 minutes, swilling the pot around occasionally, just to keep the detergent moving. Put the lid on and shake it a few times (care: slippery + hot)


      Repeat as necessary. Keep it hot with a little boiling water if needed. If you have a cafetiere, disassemble it, and soak the parts in the mixture for a few minutes, agitating occasionally.


      In both cases, the residue just falls off with almost no scrubbing. It does great things with overused filter machine filters, too.


      Important: Rinse off all detergent afterwards, use lots of fresh water!


      Return to Index




    2. How to clean an espresso machine


      If the exterior needs cleaning, just use a good cleaner like Fantastik or the like - note though that Fantastik might actually remove some of the stamped on text and logos if they are painted on.


      If the interior needs cleaning, you need to decalcify it. Add about 3 oz. of vinegar to about 20 oz. of water, and let it run through the machine. Then run about 3-4 times the amount of fresh water. Several online coffee sites have info on decalcifying.


      If you can disassemble the frothing wand, do so - and get the wand almost sterile-clean. If little rubber gaskets pop out, DON'T LOSE THEM and remember what order they go back on.


      Same thing goes for the brewhead - that's where the water comes out - most pump machines have a brewhead that can be removed with a single screw - tilt your machine on its side (make sure there's no water in it) and disassemble that part - again, do get it crystal clean - use toothbrushes, use a clean j-cloth, whatever it takes to get all the nooks and crannies.


      Once the machine is cleaned inside and out, run one more full batch of water through it, making sure you stop the pump just before all the water drains out.


      Return to Index




    3. How to store coffee?


      One should always store coffee beans in a glass, air-tight container. Air and moisture are coffee's principle enemies. Glass is best because it doesn't retain the odors of the beans or the oils, which could contaminate future beans stored in the same container. However, if you use glass, make sure the container is not exposed to light, as sunlight is believed to reduce freshness.


      Buy only what coffee can be consumed in a week to a week and a half from the time it was roasted. This is the only way to have truly fresh coffee.
      Do not freeze ground coffee. There are two key problems here. One, the freezing will damage some of subtle tastes in the coffee and two, when the coffee is taken out the container will sweat, exposing your coffee to moisture.


      Return to Index




    4. What kind of grinder should I buy?


      First off, any grinder is better than having your coffee preground at the store. Pregrinding is just a way of insuring stale coffee.


      Perhaps the earliest form of grinding anything, whether it be spices or coffee, was the simple mortar and pestle approach. The item to be ground - or crushed as it were - was placed in the bottom of a bowl, and the blunt end of a stick was used to crush said item along the bowl's bottom and sides. Following this - and history tends to lead us down numerous paths - mechanical means replaced the mortar and pestle. Manually operated, the coffee (or, again, spice, wheat, corn... whatever) was placed between a stationary and a moving disc. The movement of the one disc atop the other created a grinding force. This is also known as milling; a term we carry into the present.


      Milling has become very efficient with the use of electrical motors as opposed to horses, water, steam, or human-power. And milling, as a process, is as common to the agricultural industry as it is to coffee. To understand the benefit of milling coffee, let us first compare it to another popular grinding technique, the blade-style coffee grinder. Available in practically every housewares store in the world, the blade-style grinder uses a small, universal electrical motor to spin two metal blades at very high speeds. When in contact with the coffee beans, the blades chop and crush the bean's structure. Akin to the mortar and pestle for not creating a uniform grind, this method is quick and inexpensive. Many models of this type can be had for less than 20$US.


      A step up, and the primary focus of this article, is the burr style, or milling style coffee grinder. Like the wheat or corn grinder, and essentially identical to commercial, industrial-sized grinders, the burr grinder for today's consumer is available in a myriad of colors, features, materials, and prices.


      Why a burr grinder?
      As mentioned above, the blade variant of coffee grinders allows a varying particle size from the resultant grind. The leading reason for the use of a burr grinder is the ability to produce a uniform grind of the beans. A uniform grind is important for a few different reasons. First, it provides an even surface area for extraction during whatever brew process you may wish to use. Second, for espresso, the uniform grind allows for even wetting and even packing of the grounds.


      How come?
      Let us return above. An even grind will provide for an even extraction of the oils from the coffee. Ill-proportioned grind will cause some of the coffee to over-extract, and some to under-extract. Over-extracted coffee will taste bitter and overly pungent. Under-extracted will taste weak and thin.


      Burr grinders, ideally and theoretically, pass an incoming bean under (or in between) its burrs once. Whether it be for one revolution or two, the bean, as it finishes its pass, is completely crushed into identically-sized pieces. Blade-style and mortar and pestle re-grind the coffee, which provides the inconsistency mentioned above.


      The Big Debate - Flat-Plate Burr Grinders vs. Conical Burr Grinders:
      Burr grinders are distinct by two forms. The first is where the burrs are plate-shaped and lie atop each other. In the second model, the burrs are shaped like two mating cones; the grinding teeth facing toward each burr set. The debate lies with life expectancy (read: wear), grind consistency, and ease of cleaning. To begin with, both variations are easy to clean so long as the manufacturer designed the grinder to allow one of the two burr sets to be removed. To my knowledge, every manufacturer has done so. It is up to the owner to find the appropriate cleaning tool used to get into the teeth's grooves. Incidentally, a stiff bristled brush like that of a toothbrush works well. The debate flourishes here: does a conical burr-set wear more but provide a greater grind consistency and slower operating speed (due to prolonged contact between bean and burr), or does the flat-plate burr-set provide greater consistency and life because of its ability to operate at faster speeds? You decide. There are arguments for and against both parties. All in all, to the average consumer, this argument is like the blowing of the wind. Meaningless.


      "You get what you paid for."
      I mentioned this above. And it is true, especially when you figure in other factors to your potential purchase. These factors are as follows:


      Does the machine come with a warranty? If so, how many years?
      May I try the machine first before committing to a purchase?
      Is the machine too loud?
      Is the machine easy to clean up? Does its spill or throw ground coffee all over the place?
      Is there service available in my area? If so, how much extra and how easy is it to obtain?
      Is the machine repairable by myself or a local appliance repairperson?
      Keep all of these questions on the tip of your brain when and after you go shopping. You'll find distinct differences between each and every model mentioned above. It is true that the higher you go, the greater the quality of the machine - both in materials used and end product. Consistency is still very much a driving argument and consistency is best achieved when higher-quality components and material are used.


      These are the biggest questions you need to keep on your mind:


      How much will you use this grinder and for what reasons? Do you plan on only grinding for one style of coffee? Do you plan on using it daily? Do you plan on using many different types of coffee beans?


      If you can answer these questions, you can narrow down your search very easily.


      For more info and the full text of this article check out http://www.seasoned.com/issues/199809/


      Another point that deserves attention is that many cheap coffee grinders have a tendency to have some type of static problems. Some of the more expensive models can also have these same problems so, as with other considerations, be sure to try the grinder before you buy.


      Return to Index





  • Miscellaneous




    1. How do you spell Colombia/Colombian?


      Please read the question :).


      Return to Index




    2. How do you spell Espresso?


      By far, the most common spelling used throughout the world today is "espresso". This is a shortened form of the original Italian name for the drink "caffe espresso" (accent marks omitted). This spelling is considered to be the correct spelling by the vast majority of of coffee consumers, vendors, retailers, and producers.


      Some English language dictionaries also list "expresso" as a variant spelling. However, this does not mean the spelling is 'equally valid.' (see the post by Jesse Sheidlower included below)


      It was pointed out during the great "espresso vs. expresso" debate (spring '94) that the Italian alphabet does not even contain the letter "X," which is incorrect.


      Further, it was discovered that at least three dictionaries contained incorrect definitions of the word "espresso". The American Heritage Dictionary gave the following definition:



      "A strong coffee brewed by forcing steam under pressure through darkly roasted, powdered coffee beans."



      The Oxford English Dictionary said:



      "Coffee brewed by forcing steam through powdered coffee beans"



      The Webster New World Dictionary gives:



      "coffee prepared in a special machine from finely ground coffee beans, through which steam under high pressure is forced."



      All three of these are wrong. In fact, espresso is a strong coffee brewed by quickly forcing hot water through darkly roasted, finely-ground coffee beans.


      (Some espresso makers do use steam, but only to force the hot water through the ground coffee. The steam NEVER touches the coffee. Many espresso makers use no steam at all. Instead, they use either a pump or a piston to quickly force hot water through the ground coffee.)


      Once these errors and the origins of the word "espresso" had been pointed out, the argument "but expresso is in the dictionary" quickly began to crumble. The final death blow to this position came in a post by dictionary editor Jesse Sheidlower. This post is reproduced in its entirety below:



      Jesse Sheidlower writes


      I find this thread fascinating. I regret that it demonstrates an unfamiliarity with dictionaries and how to use them, but no matter. I believe that I am the only dictionary editor to participate in this discussion, so let me waste a bit more bandwidth addressing some of the points made so far, and introducing a few others:



      • The OED, Second Edition, does include _espresso_ and _expresso_, the latter being a variant of the former. It correctly derives it from Italian _caffe espresso_. [Accents left off here.] Whoever claimed it derives the term from a would-be Italian _caffe expresso_ was in error.

      • There _is_ an "x" in Latin and Italian.

        Mike Oliver points out that there are two Italian alphabets, one (il tradizionale) with no w, x or y, and the other one with all the letters in the English alphabet. The latter seems to be the one currently in use. (Reference: Il grande dizionario Garzanti della lingua italiana, Garzanti Editore s.p.a, 1987).



      • There are four major American dictionaries (published by Merriam Webster, Webster's New World, Random House, and American Heritage). The most recent edition of each gives _espresso_ as the main form, and _expresso_ as a variant only. The fact that _expresso_ is listed in the dictionary does not mean that it is equally common: the front matter for each dictionary explains this. The person who claimed that three dictionaries including OED give _expresso_ as "equally valid" was in error.




    3. Dictionaries, in general, do not dictate usage: they reflect the usage that exists in the language. If a dictionary says that _espresso_ is the main spelling, it means that in the experience of its editors (based on an examination of the language), _espresso_ is notably more common. It does not mean that the editors have a vendetta against _expresso_.

    4. To the linguist who rejects the authority of dictionaries: I agree that language is constantly changing; I'm sure that every dictionary editor in the country does as well. Dictionaries are outdated before they go to press. But I think they remain accurate to a large extent. Also, if you are going to disagree with the conclusions of a dictionary, you should be prepared to back yourself up. I can defend, with extensive written evidence, our decision to give _espresso_ as the preferred form.

    5. The spelling _espresso_ is the form used by the copy desks of the _New York Times,_ _Gourmet,_ _Bon Appetit,_ The _Wine Spectator,_ the _Wall St. Journal,_ the _L.A. Times,_ _Time,_ _Newsweek,_ and to my knowledge every other major or minor newspaper or magazine, general or food-related, in the English-speaking world. The fact that a handwritten menu on an Italian restaurant door spells it "expresso" is trivial by comparison.

    6. In sum: though both _espresso_ and _expresso_ are found, the former is by far the more common. It is also to be favored on immediate etymological evidence, since the Italian word from which it is directly borrowed is spelled _espresso_. The form _espresso_ is clearly preferred by all mainstream sources.


    7. Return to Index




    8. Where did the term "cup of joe" come from?


      It has recently come to my attention that the answer to this question is a bit up in the air so I will be reporting reasonable possibilities that I pick up from the news groups here. Some or all may be urban legend but until I have a sure way to know I will use this system.


      1. The U.S. Navy used to serve alcoholic beverages on board ships. However, when Admiral Josephus "Joe" Daniels became Chief of Naval Operations, he outlawed alcohol onboard ships, except for very special occasions. Coffee then became the beverage of choice, hence the term "Cup of Joe."


      2. "Joe" is 19th Cent. American slang for coffee.


      Return to Index




    9. What is a Kopi Luak (Kopi Luwak)?


      The only coffee of commerce today that is the product of an animal's digestive tract is Kopi Luak or Luwak from Sumatra, Java and Sulawesi in Indonesia. It is reported that the yearly crop is about 80 LB total. It retails in the US for about $18.50 oz. or $296.00 LB. and is available from John Martinez & Son in Atlanta, GA.
      According to the former head of the Indonesian national zoo, as told to the Smithsonian's rep. Kopi Luak is a fiction with a great sales pitch. (See: http://www.si.edu/natzoo/coffee.htm )
      Does it really exist? That is a good question. Is something being sold in the US as Kopi Luak? Yes.
      Check out what Dave Barry had to say about it at: http://home.earthlink.net/~munson/tom/coffee/nov9.html.

      Return to Index




    10. How much caffeine is in decaf?


      In the United States federal regulations require that in order to label coffee as "decaffeinated" that coffee must have had its caffeine level reduced by no less than 97.5 percent.


      Example: Panamanian coffee is about 1.36% caffeine by weight normally. This and many other arabica coffees are about 98.64% caffeine free even before anything is done to lower the caffeine content..


      When 97% of the caffeine has been removed only .0408 % of the coffee weight is caffeine. About 4/10ths of 1%. At this level it is labeled "decaffeinated. How roasters label their products is another matter. Suppose two roasters roast Panama coffee that originally came from the same lot, and were decaffeinated together in the same vat. One roaster labels his decaf. "97% Caffeine Removed." The other says his is "99+% Caffeine Free." Which roaster is not telling the truth?


      The answer is: They are both right. They are both essentially saying the same thing. But, which decaf. does the average consumer believe has the least caffeine?


      Currently used solvents for decaffeinating coffee include, H2O (water), CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), Meth. Chloride, Ethyl Acetate. Note: A relatively new method called Swiss Water Decaffeinated uses "flavor-charged" water in the decaffeination process.


      Return to Index





  • Coffee Recipes.


    NOTE: I do not entirely agree with some of the assertions made in a couple of these recipes and do not know much about some of the preparation methods described, so use these at your own risk.




    1. Espresso


      I need a good write up of how to make espresso. Someone please help out here.




    Return to Index




  • Chocolate covered espresso beans


    You won't get single, glossy beans, but the taste is there!



    1. Put dark roast coffee beans on a waxpaper-covered baking sheet.

    2. Melt some chocolate by putting a container with the chocolate in a pan of boiling water, stir the chocolate when it is getting hot. Some experimentation regarding what chocolate to use is in place. I used chocolate chips from Ghiradelli. One should probably aim for dark and not too sweet chocolate.

    3. Pour the chocolate over the beans and smear it so that each bean is covered - you should have a single layer of covered beans not too far apart.

    4. When the beans have cooled off a little bit, put the sheet in the fridge/freezer.

    5. When solid, break off a piece and enjoy. Note: I often use very finely ground (think espresso grind) coffee for this.


    Return to Index




  • Cappuccino


    Disclaimer: People prepare cappuccino in many different ways, and in their very own way, each one of them is correct. The following recipe, which is commonly used in Latin countries, has been tasted by several of my North American friends and they unanimously agreed that cappuccino prepared using this recipe tastes much better than the standard fare in USA/Canada.


    Start with cold milk (it doesn't really need to be ice-cold), use homo. milk or carnation. 2% or skim is just not thick enough (though admittedly, it is easier to produce foam with skim milk).


    Place the milk in a special cappuccino glass with a cappuccino basket. (Cappuccino glasses have a thinner bottom).


    Aerate the milk near the top, within 2cm (1 in.) of the top. Move the glass down as the milk aerates. It is a good idea to have an oscillating motion while aerating the milk. (ed. The process of oscillation probably won't really add much to your drink but it does look cool.)


    Aerating the milk in another container, then pouring in a glass and adding the foam with a spoon is sacrilege.


    If you need to aerate the milk in a separate container, aerate exactly the amount of milk required for one cup, so no need to add foam with a spoon.


    Once the milk has been aerated, promptly clean the aerator with a wet rag. Failure to do so will quickly result in rotten milk flavor coming from the aerator.


    Another warning on similar lines applies to restaurant-type coffee machines: leave the aerator valve open when powering the machine up and down. When the machine is off a partial vacuum is formed in the boiler that will suck milk residue into the boiler. This then coats the inside of the boiler and can cause bad smelling steam until the boiler is flushed. Some machines have a vacuum bleed valve to prevent this problem but many don't.


    Wait for the steam pressure to build up again (for some cappuccino makers wait time is near zero, for others it may be as long as 60 secs.).


    Prepare the espresso coffee - you may add it directly to the glass if possible or use a cup and then pour it from the cup on the milk.


    According to Jym Dyer: In Italy, the milk is added TO the espresso, not the other way around, that way the milk is floating; on top, where you then add the sugar, and stir it up.


    Cappuccino tastes better when it is really hot, and has two teaspoons of sugar. (small teaspoons, like the ones in expensive silverware).


    Then, accompany said cappuccino with a warm tea bisquit or English muffin with marmalade, or alternatively with a baguette sandwich or panini.


    Return to Index




  • Frappe


    Frappe coffee is widely consumed in parts of Europe and Latin America, especially in summer. Originally, it was made with cold espresso. Nowadays it is prepared in most places by shaking into a shaker 1-2 teaspoons of instant coffee with sugar, water and ice-cubes and it is served in a long glass with ice, milk to taste and a straw. The important thing is the thick froth on top of the glass.


    Return to Index




  • How to make the best cup of coffee?


    The best coffee I ever tasted was while in the coffee growing regions of Mexico, in the state of Veracruz, in the town of Coatepec. The quality of the coffee was mostly due to the method of preparation rather than the quality of the grains (which is at about the same level as an average Colombian coffee). Here's how to make it:



    • Grind the coffee grains from coarse to very coarse.

    • Boil in a pan a liter of water (four cups).

    • When the water is boiling, turn off the stove and add 8-12 tablespoons of coffee (2-3 spoons for each cup).

    • Add 2-3 teaspoons of sugar per cup (for a total of 8-12 spoons of sugar).

    • Stir very slowly (the water is so hot that the sugar dissolves mostly on its own).

    • Let the coffee rest for about 5 minutes.

    • Strain the coffee using a metal strainer! Like the ones used for cooking. The strainer should be like the ones used by granny for making tea. The diameter is a bit smaller than a cup, with a semi-sphere shape.

    • This coffee has grit in the bottom, even after being strained. Therefore do not stir the pot or the cup. If the coffee is shaken, let it rest for about five minutes. Needless to say, do not drink the last sip of coffee from the cup: it's all grit. If you want to add milk, add Carnation.


    Warning: This coffee may fool you 'cause it has a very smooth taste but is extremely strong. Caffeine content per milliliter is right there with espresso, but you can't tell!


    Note: For some strange reason, when preparing this coffee I tend to have a success ratio of about one out of two attempts. I still don't know what I'm doing wrong, since, as far as I can tell, I always repeat the same steps. Perhaps sometimes I don't let the coffee rest long enough.


    This type of coffee is similar in nature to the French press. And in principle, you could possibly add sugar to the ground coffee, then pour water, and lastly press with the strainer.


    Return to Index




  • Turkish Coffee


    Turkish coffee is prepared using a little copper pot called a raqwa.


    Use a heaping teaspoon of very finely-ground coffee and, optionally, one heaping teaspoon of sugar (to taste). Use about 3oz of coffee. [Add the sugar only just before boiling point.] Turkish coffee without sugar is called sade, with a little sugar is "orta s,ekerli" and with lots of sugar is "c,ok s,ekerli".


    The trick of it is to heat it until it froths, pour the froth into the coffee cup and heat it a second time. When it froths again, pour the rest into the cup.


    The grounds will settle to the bottom of the cup as you drink the coffee and towards the end, it'll start to taste bitter and the texture will be more like wet coffee grounds than a drink. As soon as this happens stop or your next sip will taste really, really bitter. Instead, turn your cup upside down on the saucer, and let someone read your fortune!


    Return to Index




  • Irish Coffee


    Ingredients



    • Sturdy wine glass or glass with stem

    • 1 teaspoon sugar

    • 1 or 2 tablespoons Irish whiskey

    • black coffee

    • cream, lightly whipped


    Instructions



    1. Place spoon in glass. Heat glass by pouring in warm water. When glass is warm, pour out the water. Leave spoon in glass.

    2. Put sugar, whiskey and coffee in glass. Stir to dissolve sugar. Still leave spoon in glass.

    3. Now for the tricky bit: Put dollop of cream on top, allow the cream to slide down the back of spoon (the spoon which was in the coffee), the tip of the spoon should remain in the coffee.


    Be careful not to stir after the cream has been added. The cream should form a foamy layer about 1 cm (or half an inch) thick on top of the black coffee.


    Return to Index




  • Thai Iced Coffee


    Make very strong coffee (50-100% more coffee to water than usual), use something like Cafe Du Monde which has chicory in it. Pour 6-8 oz into cup and add about 1 Tbs. sweetened condensed milk. Stir, then pour over ice.


    You'll have to experiment with the strength and milk so you get lots of taste after the ice/water dilutes it.


    Alternatively, this version which comes from a newspaper article of many years ago simply calls for grinding two or three fresh cardamom pods and putting them in with the coffee grounds. Make a strong coffee with a fresh dark roast, chill it, sweeten and add half-and-half to taste.


    Lastly, we have the following recipe:


    Makes 1 8-cup pot of coffee



    • 6 tablespoons whole rich coffee beans, ground fine

    • 1/4 teaspoon ground coriander powder

    • 4 or 5 whole green cardamom pods, ground



  • Place the coffee and spices in the filter cone of your coffee maker. Brew coffee as usual; let it cool.

  • In a tall glass, dissolve 1 or 2 teaspoons of sugar in an ounce of the coffee (it's easier to dissolve than if you put it right over ice). Add 5-6 ice cubes and pour coffee to within about 1" of the top of the glass.

  • Rest a spoon on top of the coffee and slowly pour whipping cream into the spoon. This will make the cream float on top of the coffee rather than dispersing into it right away.

  • To be totally cool, serve with Flexi-Straws and paper umbrellas...


One other fun note: I got a fresh vanilla bean recently and put it to good use by sealing it in an airtight container with my sugar. The sugar gets the faintest vanilla aroma and is incredible in Real Chocolate Milk (TM) and iced coffee.


One final note: this would probably be even better with iced espresso, because the espresso is so much more powerful and loses its taste less when it's cold.


Another recipe:



  • Strong, black ground coffee

  • Sugar

  • Evaporated (not condensed) milk

  • Cardamom pods


Prepare a pot of coffee at a good European strength (Miriam Nadel suggests 2 tablespoons per cup, which I'd say is about right). In the ground coffee, add 2 or 3 freshly ground cardamom pods. (I've used green ones, I imagine the brown ones would give a slightly different flavor.) Sweeten while hot, then cool quickly.


Serve over ice, with unsweetened evaporated milk (or heavy cream if you're feeling extra indulgent). To get the layered effect, place a spoon atop the coffee and pour the milk carefully into the spoon so that it floats on the top of the coffee.


The recipe I have calls for:



  • 1/4 cup strong French roasted coffee

  • 1/2 cup boiling water

  • 2 tsp. sweetened condensed milk

  • Mix the above and pour over ice.


I'd probably use less water and more coffee and milk.


There is also a stronger version of Thai coffee called "Oliang or Oleng" which is very strong to me and to a lot of coffee lovers.


6 to 8 tablespoons ground espresso or French roast coffee, 4 to 6 green cardamom pods, crushed sugar to taste, half-and-half or cream and ice cubes


Put the cardamom pods and the ground dark-roast coffee into a coffee press, espresso maker, or the filter of a drip coffee maker (if using a drip-style coffee maker, use half the water). Brew coffee as for espresso, stir in sugar.


Fill a large glass with ice and pour coffee over ice, leaving about 1/2 inch at the top. Place a spoon at the surface of the coffee and slowly pour half-and-half or cream into the spoon, so that it spreads across the top of the coffee rather than sinking in. (You'll stir it in yourself anyway, but this is a much prettier presentation and it's as used in most Thai restaurants.)


As with Vietnamese coffee, the struggle here is to keep from downing this all in ten seconds.


And now for another look at Thai Iced Coffee


Surely, one can get coffee with condensed milk in Thailand. But when one speaks of "Thai Iced Coffee", as found in Thai restaurants in America, one is referring to "Oliang/Oleng" [there is no standard transliteration of the Thai alphabet, so the spelling varies.] In the FAQ one reads: "There is also a stronger version of Thai coffee called "Oleng" which is very strong to me and to a lot of coffee lovers." But this IS Thai Iced Coffee. And it is only strong if you brew it to be strong.


Oliang is a blend of coffee and other ingredients. The brand I have (Pantainorasingh Brand) states the percentages right on the label: 50% coffee, 25% corn, 20% soya bean, 5% sesame seed. This blend of coffee and roasted grains is really quite exquisite--a perfect marriage of flavors!


Traditionally, oliang is brewed with a "tung tom kah fe"--a metal ring with a handle to which is attached a muslin-like cloth bag. It is much like those cloth tea-strainers one finds in Europe, only larger, like a sock. One puts the coffee in the bag and pours over it water that has come to a boil - into a carafe. Let the bag full of coffee steep in the carafe for 10 minutes. Then add sugar and stir. Let it cool. Pour into a glass with ice, and add the dairy product of your choice on top. I use fresh half-and- half, but you can use condensed milk, evaporated milk, or a mix of the two, or of the three. The proportions of coffee - water - sugar, vary. I use 2/3 part oliang to 1 1/4 parts sugar to 6 parts water.


[The tung tom kah fe can be found at SE Asian grocery stores--after a bit of searching. In Seattle at Viet Wah or Mekong Ranier.]


Alternately, one can bring water to a boil in a pot, add the coffee, and remove from heat. Let the coffee steep for 10 minutes. Then strain through cheesecloth, a coffee filter, or a fine metal strainer. And continue as above.


Return to Index


Vietnamese Iced Coffee


Same coffee as above. Sweetened condensed (not evaporated) milk, ice


Make even stronger coffee, preferably in a Vietnamese coffee maker. (This is a metal cylinder with tiny holes in the bottom and a perforated disc that fits into it; you put coffee in the bottom of the cylinder, place the disc atop it, then fill with boiling water and a very rich infusion of coffee drips slowly from the bottom.)


If you are using a Vietnamese coffee maker, put two tablespoons of sweetened condensed milk in the bottom of a cup and put the coffee maker on top of the cup. If you are making espresso or cafe filter (the infusion method where you press the plunger down through the grounds after several minutes of infusion), mix the sweetened condensed milk and the coffee any way you like.


When the milk is dissolved in the coffee (yes, dissolved *is* the right word here!), pour the combination over ice and sip.


Thai and Vietnamese coffees are very different.


Ca phe sua da (Vietnamese style iced coffee)



  • 2 to 4 tablespoons finely ground dark roast coffee (preferably with chicory)

  • 2 to 4 tablespoons sweetened condensed milk (e.g., Borden Eagle Brand, not evaporated milk!)

  • Boiling water

  • Vietnamese coffee press [see notes]

  • Ice cubes


Place ground coffee in Vietnamese coffee press and screw lid down on the grounds. Put the sweetened condensed milk in the bottom of a coffee cup and set the coffee maker on the rim. Pour boiling water over the screw lid of the press; adjust the tension on the screw lid just till bubbles appear through the water, and the coffee drips slowly out the bottom of the press.


When all water has dripped through, stir the milk and coffee together. You can drink it like this, just warm, as ca phe sua neng, but I prefer it over ice, as ca phe sua da. To serve it that way, pour the milk-coffee mixture over ice, stir, and drink as slowly as you can manage. I always gulp mine too fast. :-)


Notes:


A Vietnamese coffee press looks like a stainless steel top hat. There's a "brim" that rests on the coffee cup; in the middle of that is a cylinder with tiny perforations in the bottom. Above that rises a threaded rod, to which you screw the top of the press, which is a disc with similar tiny perforations. Water trickles through these, extracts flavor from the coffee, and then trickles through the bottom perforations. It is excruciatingly slow. Loosening the top disc speeds the process, but also weakens the resulting coffee and adds sediment to the brew.


If you can't find a Vietnamese coffee press, regular-strength espresso is an adequate substitute, particularly if made with French-roast beans or with a dark coffee with chicory. I've seen the commonly available Medaglia d'Oro brand coffee cans in Vietnamese restaurants, and it works, though you'll lose some of the subtle bitterness that the chicory offers. Luzianne brand coffee comes with chicory and is usable in Vietnamese coffee, though at home I generally get French roast from my normal coffee provider. My father tells me that when he visits Vietnamese friends in Florida that Luzianne and a local blend are the coffees sold in the local Vietnamese-run/shopped stores.


Of these two coffees, Vietnamese coffee should taste more or less like melted Haagen-Dazs coffee ice cream, while Thai iced coffee has a more fragrant and lighter flavor from the cardamom and half-and-half rather than the condensed milk. Both are exquisite, and not difficult to make once you've got the equipment.


As a final tip, I often use my old-fashioned on-the-stove espresso maker (the one shaped like an hourglass, where you put water in the bottom, coffee in the middle, and as it boils the coffee comes out in the top) for Thai iced coffee. The simplest way is merely to put the cardamom and sugar right in with the coffee, so that what comes out the top is ready to pour over ice and add half-and-half. It makes a delicious and very passable version of restaurant-style Thai iced coffee.


Return to Index


Melya



  • Espresso

  • Honey

  • Unsweetened cocoa


Brew espresso; for this purpose, a Bialetti-style stovetop will work. In a coffee mug, place 1 teaspoon of unsweetened powdered cocoa; then cover a teaspoon with honey and drizzle it into the cup. Stir while the coffee brews; this is the fun part. The cocoa seems to coat the honey without mixing, so you get a dusty, sticky mass that looks as though it will never mix. Then all at once, presto! It looks like dark chocolate sauce. Pour hot espresso over the honey, stirring to dissolve. Serve with cream (optional). I have never served this cold but I imagine it would be interesting; I use it as a great hot drink for cold days, though, so all my memories are of gray skies, heavy sweaters, damp feet and big smiles.


Return to Index


Caffe Latte


A Latte is usually a 3:1 ratio of steamed milk and espresso, but YMMV. Do what you like best.


Here's how I make a latte. First, I grind my beans to fill my shot filter. Those are the removable components in your portafilter (that arm thing). If you don't have a grinder, buy one, and buy a burr grinder - not one of those cheapo blade things.


So I grind my beans, fill my filter, and tamp it down tightly - that's the act of compressing the grind in the filter. Note: you can't really do this with the steam espresso filters because they are not designed for any real pressure (less than one bar I believe). If you do tamp a steam toy, the pressure release valve should kick in to save the day but if it does not work you are taking a chance with a very hot exploding machine. Don't tamp steam machines.


I load the espresso machine with the grinds, then turn on the machine, but to the steaming ready stage - not the espresso stage. Once it is ready, I steam my milk first.


Lattes are steamed milk, not frothed. Though again, it's your choice - if you want froth, go for it. Steam your milk to about 150F or so (you will notice a change in the steaming sound - it starts to rumble once it hits 150 or so). If you want froth, about midway, pull the steam nozzle to hover right at the surface - you want to hear a deep frothing sound - if the sound you hear is like blowing bubbles through a straw, you're too high.


Once the milk is steamed, I then take a small 4 oz. cup I have and place it under the portafilter. I switch over to making my espresso, and I brew the espresso.


I then pour the espresso into the cup with the milk. Most of my "coffee" cups are actually glass or stainless steel, or a combo of both, so I pour my espresso slowly and it creates a cool looking drink... the espresso sits near the top, just below the foam.


Add sugar, sprinkle the top with cinnamon and/or chocolate, and drink!


Oh, don't forget to clean your wand before you brew the espresso. It's quick - just grab a washcloth and scrub it clean, then run the wand once more to "flush it out" - this keeps milk from turning into harmful bacteria that makes your milk taste bad.


Once you've had your latte, dislodge the portafilter, dump your beans, give the brewhead a quick wipe, a good rinse on your filters, etc., and you're ready for your next one - less cleaning!


Note: Many people brew espresso then steam their milk. Many do it the way described here. The arguments go like this:
If you brew then steam the milk while you are waiting for the machine to reach steaming temperature, the espresso is getting old. On the other hand, if you steam then brew, you either have to let the machine cool a bit before making your shot, thus allowing the milk to cool, or you will be hitting the coffee grounds with steam and not hot water. Which is correct? I can not tell you. I rarely drink anything at home except straight shots so I don't worry myself with it too much. On a side note: if you really want the best I believe some home machines may have dual water reservoirs which will allow you to brew and steam simultaneously, or at least nearly simultaneously.


Flavoring


NOTE: Flavorings really should not be needed in good coffee but we all want something a little different every now and again. As a general rule, adding your own flavoring is a better approach to drinking flavored coffee than buying pre-flavored coffee. Commercially-flavored coffee usually uses a low quality bean since most of the flavor will be masked by the chemical flavorings anyway. So be warned - in many cases you are paying a lot for cheap beans that have had a chemical added to them to make them more palatable. It is my opinion that if you start with a good quality coffee, there is very little need for external flavoring except as an occasional change of pace. As in all things coffee, go with your taste. If you like flavored coffee by all means drink it!
One last note. If you buy flavored coffee wash all your coffee equipment thoroughly after brewing flavored coffee. The flavoring agents used will stick to anything used with them. Do not use the same grinder to grind flavored and unflavored coffee. It will take approximately 20 grinding of coffee to remove all the flavoring agents that stick to the internal part of the grinder.




    1. Chicory


      Chicory became popular in the United States as a coffee additive during the Union blockade of the South during the Civil War. It was also used again During World War II to "stretch" coffee (just ask your grandmother). It has lost popularity in the US as a coffee additive in recent years. Chicory is also used in Vietnamese coffee blends as well.
      As a flavoring, chicory has a tendency to mellow bitter coffee. Today chicory blend coffee is available canned with various ratios of coffee to chicory. There are several brands available today. I counted three when I went to the grocery store last. Chicory is also available by itself in many grocery stores, and I am told some health food stores carry chicory root as well. I recommend going with the method of buying your chicory and mixing it with fresh roasted coffee; by default any coffee you buy pre-ground and premixed will be stale when you get it. Concentration varies from 10-30% in most commercial blends.


      Return to Index




    2. Italian Syrups


      Italian syrups are popular as flavorings for espresso drinks and to a lesser extent other forms of coffee. Essentially what they are is sugar water with a flavoring added. In this they serve a dual purpose of flavoring the drink while sweetening. They also have a side role in weakening the drink they are added to. Over all I do not like Italian syrups for this last reason.
      Use your own judgement - they are very popular, so obviously many people do like them.


      Return to Index




    3. Other


      Chocolate syrup makes a great mocha. Much better than Italian syrups.


      Hot chocolate mix makes for a nice mocha and has sugar already added. I sometimes will give friends who do not like coffee a cup with a packet of instant hot chocolate mixed in to let them acquire a taste for coffee.


      Altoids make a nice peppermint coffee.


      Cinnamon is easy: just put it in the bottom of a filter for drip coffee. You can do the same for press coffee but you will have some extra sediment.


      For nut coffee: grind roasted nut of the variety you want and put it in with the coffee as it brews. Generally speaking this will not be as strong as chemical flavorings.


      Any extract you can buy can be used as a flavoring although I feel many extracts will give coffee a chemical flavor so you may get bad coffee with this method.




Return to Index


Espresso Drink Names/Terms




  1. Caffe Latte aka Cafe au Lait


    A Caffe Latte is a single shot of espresso with steamed milk. There is not frothed milk in this drink. A Caffe Latte should have approximately 6 to 8 ounces of milk in it. (Note: ordering a Latte in an Italian restaurant may get you a glass of milk so be sure to order Caffe latte.)


    Return to Index




  2. Cappuccino


    Cappuccino is traditionally equal parts espresso, steamed milk and frothed milk. Many coffee shops will add much more milk than this in the belief that bigger is better. This is not the case stick with the above proportions for good cappuccino.


    Return to Index




  3. Americano


    An Americano is a single shot of espresso with 6 to 8 ounces of hot water added. Not as bad as it sounds.


    Return to Index


    Having a website with the word coffee in the title and the question answering as the main job, why not make a post about the questions about coffee ? :) Don`t forget to visit http://ecoffeeonline.com for any thought provoking question, in any field, not only the coffee and other drinks one.




  4. Hammerhead


    A hammerhead is a shot of espresso in a coffee cup that is then filled with drip coffee. I highly recommend this drink.


    Return to Index




  5. Mocha


    This is usually a cappuccino or a Caffe Latte with chocolate syrup added. This term actually has very little meaning so you might want to ask what it is in a given coffee house before you order one.


    Return to Index




  6. Espresso Con Panna


    This is a shot with whipped cream.


    Return to Index




  7. Double


    Two shots of espresso with the same amount of all other ingredients.


    Return to Index


     




  8. Ristretto


    This is a restricted shot. Less water is allowed to come through the coffee. This is approximately a .75 ounce pull.


    Return to Index




  9. Lungo


    This is an extra long pull allowing approximately twice as much water through the same amount of coffee as normally used for a single shot. This will be bitter and I do not recommend trying it. It's about a 2-3 ounce shot.



sâmbătă, 15 septembrie 2012

How To Help A Stressed Or Depressed Loved One

I receive many emails from concerned relatives, partners and friends who are trying to help a loved one suffering the torment of a stressful or depressive episode. Sometimes, it’s easy to forget that people who love us are also affected by these illnesses and may find it difficult to understand what’s happening. They want to help, but just don’t know what to do for the best.


Having lived with a depressed partner for 3 years and suffered anxiety and depression for 5 years, I’ve experienced both sides. In this article, I’ll show you exactly what you can do – and, what you shouldn’t do – to help your loved one.


1. Please, however frustrated you feel, please never say to a depressed or stressed person: “Come on, snap out of it. What have you got to be worried or sad about anyway. People have it much worse than you.” Please understand that these illnesses cannot be “snapped out of.” You wouldn’t say this to someone with high blood pressure or pneumonia because you know it isn’t that simple. Stress, depression and anxiety are real illnesses that have specific causes. Asking someone to snap out of it makes that person feel inadequate or that they’re doing something wrong. Absolutely not so. Comparing their circumstances to people who are suffering greater hardship is no use either. I couldn’t have given two hoots about other people when I was ill because their circumstances meant nothing to me. I was struggling to solve my own problems and couldn’t see anything else. Knowing that others are starving, are terminally ill, or suffer in squalor didn’t matter a jot because they didn’t make my problems go away. One more thing about such statements: they confront the sufferer with their illness and they put pressure on them. This will cause sufferers to retreat further and further into their own world. Better is to offer love and support: “I’m always here if you need me or want to talk.” And 3 little words can mean so much: “I love you.” I didn’t hear them for 3 years and believe me, I missed them so very much.


2. As a loved one, it is totally natural to want to understand what is happening. Many loved ones conduct research into these illnesses to develop understanding. Nothing wrong with that whatsoever. However, a problem can arise if you start to impose your knowledge on the sufferer. This happens when you observe certain behaviors and habits performed by sufferers and comment on why they are behaving in such a way. For example, you hear a sufferer put themselves down, so you say “That’s a part of your illness. I’ve been reading about it and self-deprecation is one of the reasons why people become depressed. You need to stop putting yourself down.” Again, this is confrontational and puts the sufferer under pressure. All they’ll do is dismiss your comments and clam up whenever you’re around as they’ll feel they’re being scrutinised. A better way is to challenge them very gently by reminding them of a time when they did something good. For example, you hear a sufferer say: “I’m useless, I never get anything right.” You can say “Sure you do, hey, remember the time when you…”. Do you see the difference in approach? The first is more like a doctor assessing a patient, the second is just a normal, natural conversation and doesn’t mention stress, depression or anxiety. This is very, very helpful as it shifts focus from a bad event: “I’m useless…” to a good one: “remember when..” without exerting pressure.


3. Finally, you may find a resource – a book, a video, a supplement etc. – that you think will help someone to beat their illness. Perfectly natural. But there’s a problem. It confronts the sufferer with their illness and puts them under pressure to do something about it. The result of this will be resentment followed by retreat into their own world. Isolation is a part of these illnesses. Sometimes, you just can’t bear to be around people. My ex-partner used to sleep in a dark room for an entire weekend because she just couldn’t handle anyone being around her. “I bore people, I’ve nothing to say of interest and I don’t want anyone asking me how I’m feeling. I just want to be on my own.” I know, it cuts you to ribbons when you hear such words from someone you care deeply about. But please, you must resist the urge to DIRECTLY give them a resource you think will help them. For someone to emerge from these illnesses, they have to make the decision themselves. A direct offer will more often than not be refused. So, if you find something you think will help, leave it lying around somewhere your loved one will find it. The idea here is for them to CHOOSE by themselves to investigate further. Such an INDIRECT approach is more effective because once again, there is no pressure, no reminder, no confrontation. It is the sufferer who takes a willing first step towards recovery.


It is so hard to understand and reach loved ones when they’re caught up in these illnesses but please believe me, these ideas are very effective and they will help.

vineri, 14 septembrie 2012

The True Answer and the Right Answer

At the beginning of the new year I resolved to leave off writing “old grouch” columns, columns that chronicle my inability to negotiate modern life. But resolutions rarely stand in the face of provocation, and so here I go again.


My bank has been bought for the third time and once again I wasn’t consulted, which was all right the first two times, but this time everything went wrong in what was euphemistically called “the transition.”


First, all the numbers on my accounts were changed and in the new order the people at my bank (the same people who were there before) have no means of retrieving the old numbers, which have been erased from their institutional memory banks.


Second, the old credit cards were canceled, which meant that some automatic payments weren’t made on time and I received a notice of cancellation from my insurance company. The worst of it was that while the new credit cards were sent, they were returned by the postal authorities to the bank for reasons that remain a mystery.


When I called the bank in the hope of having the credit cards re-sent, the person on the other end of the phone wouldn’t talk to me because I gave the wrong answer to a question. The question was, “Where did you open this account?” I thought back through the years and the various names “my” bank had gone by and confidently said, “Chicago, Illinois, the Broadway branch.” “Wrong,” I was told, and so I offered the name of the branch I’ve been using since moving to Florida. “Wrong again.”


Well, I said, maybe what you want is the branch I’ve been talking to in New York, where I’ve been spending a month. No, not that one either. But those are the only possibilities, I protested; one of them has to be right. “I’m sorry, sir, but the information in our records does not match any of your answers and I cannot proceed any further.” But your information is incorrect, I yelled. Needless to say I didn’t get anywhere.


After many weeks without a credit card, I found out what was going on. While I had indeed opened the account in Chicago, the computer record stipulated that the right answer to the question was “Indiana” (a state I had never lived in) because that was where my original bank, now existing only in memory, had been chartered. So I was being penalized for giving the true answer to the question I had been asked, where what I should have done was give the right answer, the answer required by the system, the answer I couldn’t have possibly known.


Thinking about this, I realized that the distinction between the true answer and the right answer operates in many aspects of life. Many years ago I took my first trip to Europe and purchased a car that I sent back to the States when my fellowship was over. (Those were the days when the exchange rate was so favorable that buying a car in this way was economical.) When I picked up the car in New York I drove to the local D.M.V., and presented my California driving license. I was asked, “In what state do you want to register this car, New York or California?” I sensed that the question was consequential, but I didn’t know in what way. I dithered for a while and finally said, “What’s the right answer?” She told me (I don’t remember what it was) and I promptly gave it. Problem solved.


I should have learned my lesson — always give the right answer, not the true answer — but last year I found myself talking to an insurance company about a claim I was making. The person on the other end asked me a series of questions (like when did the damage occur) and I answered them truthfully. She took pity on me and told me that those were not the answers I should be giving. I escaped from the conversation and called a private adjuster, someone who represents claimants and knows exactly what the right answers are. He told me that I should never speak to “my” insurance company, but instead refer everything to him. He was afraid I might say something true.


The right answer is the answer a system invested in its own machinery will recognize no matter what the true facts may be. The New York Post reported recently that in October a woman with a titanium rod in her hip passed through a metal detector at J.F.K. airport without setting it off. She immediately informed the appropriate officials, who had her walk through the detector again, with the same results. She was told by a T.S.A. employee, “I can assure you the tests are correct.” She protested that nonetheless it was true that a titanium rod was implanted in her (she knew it as I knew where I opened my bank account). When the same thing happened at the same airport in December she again alerted the screeners, and for her trouble the transportation security manager sent her this e-mail: “We are confident in the performance of the WTMDS . . . throughout the aviation security system.” Once again the right answer trumped the true answer.


This is almost always the case in the law, especially in a legal system like ours that privileges procedure over substance. Lawyers know that what they have to do is find the legal rubric that will allow them to frame an issue in such a way that when the system’s questions are posed, the right answer, not the true answer, will be generated. Courts sometimes explicitly announce that the procedurally correct answer is preferable to the true answer, which is, legally, of no interest at all.


In Herrera v. Collins (1993), Leonel Torres Herrera, found guilty of murder, claimed that because new evidence proving his innocence had emerged his case should be reconsidered. Chief Justice William Rehnquist, writing for the majority, replied that innocence or guilt was not a question for his court to consider absent a demonstration that the original trial was infected by error. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, in a concurring opinion, agreed. Petitioner, she said, does not appear before us an “innocent man,” but as a “legally guilty person” who is not “entitled to get another judicial hearing” given his failure to demonstrate that the trial he received was unfair. The trial was fair, and the question of his guilt has been determined in a constitutionally correct procedure. That procedure provides the right (if not the true) answer to the question, “was he guilty?” (Herrera was later executed.)


Is this bad? Should we go off the right standard and return to the true standard? A nice idea, but one that imagines a world where the judgments reached by systems are tested against a truth that is independent of any system. Where would that truth come from, how would it be identified and how could the endless disputes about what it is be resolved? (The law’s project is to hold such disputes at bay.) It is because there are no answers to these questions that we will have to settle for the truths that systems create, deliver and validate in a sequence that may be reassuring but is finally without a foundation. You may know as I did where you opened your bank account. You may know the true answer. But you had better give the right answer.

marți, 11 septembrie 2012

How To Write a Product Review

One of the best ways a person can get information about an astronomical product they are interested in is via a well-written review by someone who actually owns that product and has used it over some time. However, to be truly useful, a review must not just be a long version of "I loved it", or "I think its a pile of junk!". It must be a *fair* well thought out in-depth discriptive discussion of what the product is, its intended uses, and how well it works on the tasks it was designed for. One fairly good way to learn how to write reviews is to just write them for a while in your local Astronomy club newsletter (or even on sci.astro.amateur), and take note of any feedback you get. The basic rule in writing is: the more you write, the better you get at it, and this goes for reviews as well. After writing reviews for a number of years, I have found a few helpful ways of insuring that the review remain focused and beneficial. They are not intended as "rules" which must be followed to the letter, but hopefully, some of these tips might be of use to those of you who decide to take the plunge into critical writing.

Tip #1: Structure The Review

A review which has little or no structure can often end up as just a long rambling essay which is difficult to read and which fails to make the review's relevant points stand out. Putting an organized form to the review helps the author organize his/her thoughts, as well as making it a little easier for the reader to pick out the information of interest. Each author will undoubtedly have to develop their own style of organized form, but as an example, I will show my own review form. I usually divide my review articles into four distinct segments: the Preamble, Product Description/Features, Product Performance, and Summary remarks.

The PREAMBLE generally consists of the title (including product name, manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP), and an available outlet for purchasing) along with some brief introductory remarks. These remarks could eflect an experience you had which made you think about buying the product, or they could be just a quick summary of what the product is. Let's say I am going to review the XYZ Optics new product: THE WHIZ-BANG; an automatic telescope "setter-upper" (yea, right, I know, wishful thinking!). My preamble could go something like this:

"One of the more frustrating things for the amateur astronomer is setting up their scope in the middle of winter with cold gloved hands lifting heavy mirror boxes while fumbling to find the right Allen wrench without impaling the neighbor's dog with the truss tubes! Well folks, our troubles are over! The new XYZ Optics WHIZ-BANG automatic telescope assembler with the push of just one button takes much of the agony out of assembly, and some of the confusion out of collimation!"



The Preamble sets the tone for the rest of the article, and can drop a few hints as to how the reviewer feels about the product (obviously, this reviewer likes the Whiz-Bang). At the very least, it should act as a kind of "expanded title", to give the reader a rough idea of what the product actually is. It also should be *short*, so as not to keep the reader from having to wade through too much material to get to the meat of the article.

The next section is the PRODUCT DESCRIPTION/FEATURES. This section often is the 1st or 2nd longest one in the review, and should include the product's vital statistics and features (size, weight, aperture, appearance, accessories, ect.), as well as a complete description of exactly what the product actually does. However, extremely technical descriptions of function are not always necessary, unless a lack of such knowledge might severely impact the owner's purchase decision or future use of the product. The Product Description can include a few comments concerning how well things go together or opinions on design and setup, but most of the main review criticism should probably wait until the Performance section gets going..

The third section, PRODUCT PERFORMANCE, is the real meat of the article, and contains most of the information about how well the product worked. Its information should have a firm basis in actual use of the product, with accounts of *extensive* observations or first hand experience with the reviewed item. However, to keep this section from going too long, observation reports should probably be limited to those which show specific performance traits (ie: don't make it an overly-long unorganized "laundry list" of uncoordinated observations or objects which just look good in the scope). Keeping things down to an easily readable length should be kept in mind continuously when writing good product reviews.

The final segment is the SUMMARY REMARKS, which sort of "ties the ribbons" on the review. In it, the reviewer gives a brief one or two line summary of the article's highpoints. Again, as an example, here is the WHIZ-BANG summary:


"SUMMARY: The XYZ Optics WHIZ-BANG Automatic Telescope Assembler is a good way to avoid some of the headaches involved with the nightly setup routine. While not inexpensive, nor able to completely eliminate the setup process, it does provide a much simpler and less irritating way to get things up and running."


Hopefully, this style of review organization will give you at least some idea of how to proceed when writing one yourself. You need not stick to exactly this kind of layout, but I have found this form to be a fairly useful one. As far as to how long a review should be, it depends greatly on what the reviewed item is and what the style of the writer develops into. However, remember that the faster you are able to convey the information to the reader, the better the review will generally be.

Tip #2: Know Your Product

A review should be done *only* after the reviewer has had a *lot* of time to use the item. When I first reviewed Celestron's "Short Tube" 80mm f/5 scope, I had used it for only two weeks. However, after some more study (and some additional input from a friend of mine), some of my opinions and experiences changed significantly, requiring a partial rewrite of the performance section. I would probably recommend no less than a month or two's experience with the reviewed product before even attempting a first draft of the review. Also, when doing the initial observations, explore a wide variety of targets or techniques to fully determine what works with the product and what may or may not work well.

Tip #3: Do Comparisons If Possible

Comparing one scope to a similar one can really help the reader pin down their feelings about purchasing the scope. However, there are some potential pitfalls with this method. If the apertures are not the same or the viewing comparisons are done under differing conditions, performance differences can be seen which are not necessarily the fault of the reviewed instrument.

Quality differences due to vast differences in price can also lead to an undue slant to the review. To help avoid these problems, the items which are compared should be fairly equivalent to each other, and should be used under the same conditions. For telescopes and eyepieces, observations should be made at nearly the same magnfications and atmospheric conditions. If you can't easily do such comparisons, just state what your experences are with the reviewed item and try to avoid speculative comparisons or those done from some old memory about a scope you once used. One thing I have done for reviewing smaller aperture scopes is to use an off-axis stop on my ten inch to simulate a small scope's performance, thus allowing a comparison at equal apertures.

Tip #4: Use Your Observational "Tools"

For optical assessment, the star test is one of the better ways to judge performance, so you should become familiar with at least a simple form of this test. However, remember that to the critical well-trained eye, the star test is capable of revealing optical defects which have little or no impact in the final in-focus image, so don't be too critical. Double star tests, while interesting to mention in reviews, are not quite as useful for judging the contrast and quality of optics, since things like secondary obstruction and residual spherical aberration often don't impact the view of double stars as much as they do high power planetary detail. For telescope mountings, become familiar with the "tap" test on a variety of mounts, so you can accurately judge how steady a reviewed mount is. Damping times of 3 seconds or less at moderate powers can be considered good to excellent performance in a mount, depending on the exact power used and the telescope size being supported.

Tip #5: Write a Fair and Balanced Review

It can be hard for a person to put aside many personal beliefs and just put up the facts, but many times, that can be a good way to write a good review. The personal touch of opinion can be blended into the later parts of a review, but for the best results, the facts come first. The key is to be very aware of your biases and compensate accordingly. I like Newtonians, so if I review a refractor, that bias sometimes has to consciously acknowledged or even supressed a little in order to keep the review balanced. Quality and price issues are also a bias. For example, a small low-cost wide-field refractor like the 80mm f/5 "short tube" achromats cannot easily compete with the performance of an expensive 3 element Apochromat, nor should it be expected to. These inexpensive scopes don't generally perform as well at higher powers, but they were never designed to do so. To call them less than satisfactory just because they don't do well in one area, or against another much more expensive instrument might be a little unfair. Such performance problems can indeed be mentioned in a review, but this *must* be done in a carefully balanced manner which does not overshadow good performance in some other area. A review must look at all the areas of operation equally, with notable attention paid to what the item was actually designed for and to how "cost effective" the item is. Presenting the facts and BALANCE are the real keys to a great product review.

Summary


Writing a review has two notable benefits. It gets potentially useful information out to those who might need it, plus, it makes the reviewer *think* more about various issues, eventually making the writer an even better and more informed equipment purchaser. I encourage those who have specific experience with some item which might be useful to the amateurr Astronomer to consider writing a review about it. Now all of you can get out there and start banging away on those keys! :-). Clear skies to you.

sâmbătă, 8 septembrie 2012

Searching for answers after firm's collapse




WASHINGTON — Lawmakers and investors are searching for answers and demanding change from regulators charged with overseeing the futures sector following the implosion of an Iowa-based investment firm — the latest company to collapse and rattle market confidence.


Peregrine Financial Group and founder Russell Wasendorf Sr. are accused by federal regulators of misusing about $215 million of customer money that is now missing.


Wasendorf was found Monday outside the company’s Cedar Falls headquarters, after an apparent suicide attempt. The National Futures Association, which was the firm’s primary regulator, said Peregrine may have falsified financial documents.


The company was ordered shut down, and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on Tuesday.


The downfall is the latest to outrage Washington lawmakers and investors astounded that customer funds were again left unprotected, and that regulators were unable to effectively oversee the futures market.


Jill Sommers, a Republican commissioner at the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, said Wednesday that until investigators know everything that happened in the Peregrine case it’s difficult to assess how well the current regulatory system worked and what, if any, improvements need to be made. “You can’t write rules around every possible type of fraud out there,” she noted.


The collapse of Peregrine is the latest scandal to rattle the futures industry following the bankruptcy nearly nine months ago of Wall Street brokerage firm MF Global, led by former New Jersey Sen. Jon Corzine. In the MF Global case, more than $1 billion in customer money disappeared, leading to criticism that the CFTC and almost a half-dozen other regulators policing various parts of the firm were not watching its bookkeeping closely enough.


Soon after MF Global’s demise, customers fled the market and trading volume dropped, prompting regulators to acknowledge that steps needed to be taken to restore public confidence. While some measures have been put in place and regulators are considering a host of others, market watchers, investors and lawmakers fear the $215 million of customer funds missing from Peregrine could erode any progress that has been made to restore that trust.


U.S. lawmakers quickly called for increased oversight in the wake of the Peregrine collapse.


“The dramatic collapses of Peregrine and MF Global within a period of months very strongly indicates the need to reform the system for regulating and policing futures firms in order to protect customers, investors, and the integrity of markets,” said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Ia. He said the effectiveness of the self-regulatory model used to govern the futures industry should be reviewed.


Fellow Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican, said he will be a sending a letter to the CFTC and the NFA to see “if they are doing their job.” Grassley said most of the rules to regulate the market may already be in place, which would indicate a failure to properly enforce existing regulations.


“When you have things like MF Global and PFG . . . it makes you wonder if” regulators are doing their job, said Grassley. “We have a responsibility to . . . make sure that the laws are being done.” Both Iowa lawmakers are members of the Senate Agriculture Committee, which oversees the CFTC. Grassley also sits on the Senate Finance Committee.


Peregrine helped customers minimize their future risk through a process called hedging. The firm helped customers buy, sell and trade foreign currency, futures and options and investments whose value can change depending on the expected future price of food, energy and other goods.


Even though investigators are trying to uncover what happened at Peregrine, agriculture groups said a risk remains to customer funds, which are supposed to be protected.


Dave Miller, director of research and commodities at the Iowa Farm Bureau, said if the problems at Peregrine date back to 2010, as regulatory documents indicate, it appears regulatory oversight failed.


“Farmers, grain elevators, and other customers have to have trust in both the brokerage houses … and the regulatory process,” he said. “And there appears to be a breakdown.”


“Farmers put a lot of trust in the futures market system,” either individually or through their cooperatives that are working to reduce risk, Miller said. “And to have that trust shaken by these types of events becomes problematic for everyone in the system.”


The apparent misuse of customer funds could spur Congress to establish an insurance fund to make up any shortfalls to customers in the futures world, similar to the Securities Investor Protection Corporation for securities and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for banking. The measure has long been promoted by Bart Chilton, a Democratic commissioner at the CFTC, but so far has not garnered the necessary support from lawmakers.


Michael Greenberger, a law professor at the University of Maryland and a former director of trading and markets for the CFTC, said the discovery of a second firm apparently misusing customer funds “is going to cause a crisis of confidence in the market.” He said the self-regulatory auditing system is not working, and he advocated changes, such as giving the CFTC the proper funding to audit or supervise the auditors to help restore confidence.


“Whether or not it is systemic, in reality the consumer population views it as systemic and is going to cause people to decide, for example, that it isn’t worth hedging because it’s complicated enough to hedge when your money isn’t stolen,” said Greenberger. “I think even speculators that lose their money are going to speculate in another area. This is too dangerous.”


Donnelle Eller of The Des Moines Register contributed to this story.




vineri, 7 septembrie 2012

Business Intelligence Questionnaire

A business intelligence questionnaire gauges a business owner’s or the business manager’s knowledge about the market and competition. Knowledge about the prevailing preferences, trends and dislikes in the market is essential for any business owner who hopes to remain competitive. Having first-hand information about the strategies that competitors are engaging in further gives the business owner the ideas necessary to formulate his or her own counter-strategies.  The business intelligence questionnaire contains both open and close-ended questions meant to help the business owner identify his or her weak spots in market intelligence as well as his/her ability to understand the competition. Below is a sample questionnaire:


Business Name_________________________


Q1. Do you have knowledge of current activities about your competitors? __________


Q2. Do you have the profiles of any new business entrant seeking to play in the same market segment as you? _________


Q3. Have you been able to fully utilize emerging technologies for purposes of your organization’s way of doing business? __________


If so, please specify_____________________________


Q4. How does your use of technology measure against your main competitors?


?We are way ahead of them


 

 


?We are neck to neck with them


?They are slightly ahead of them


?They are far more ahead of us


Q5. What does your organization do to ensure that it has all the necessary market intelligence necessary to gauge competition? ____________________


Q6. Do employees realize the value of business intelligence? _________


Q7. Do you encourage your clients to give your organization feedback regarding the quality, price, packaging or placement of your products and services? ___________


Q8. Does your business have information regarding legislative trends or any pending legislation that will affect the business? ____________________


Q9. How do you ensure that a product will be accepted in a specific market before launching it? ______________________



joi, 6 septembrie 2012

Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire

The health risk assessment questionnaire is prepared by physicians and health care professionals to assess the health condition of the patient. The health risk assessment questionnaire addresses topics such as blood results, lung capacity, all major lifestyle factors, personal and family history, symptoms, functional health status and quality of life, health interests, readiness for change, self-efficacy, overall wellness, current fitness level, heart health, stress and coping, eating habits, drug and alcohol use, and medical care.


Having any other thought provoking questions ? Check out the articles provided by ecoffeeonline.com


It helps in helping patients make healthy lifestyle decisions and make appropriate use of medical services and to provide an organized approach to review a patient or organization’s use of medical services.


Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire Sample


 


 

 


Name:


Age:


Weight:


Sex:



  1. If you had to rate your health between1 to 5, how would you rate it?


  1. Do you currently smoke cigarettes, pipe, cigar or hookah?


  1. How often do you consume alcohol?


  1. How many alcoholic beverages do you take during a day when you drink?


  1. How often do you feel that your work pressure is putting you under stress?


  1. Do you usually feel depressed, angry or in need of help?


  1. How often do you have sex?


  1. How often do you use protection whenever you have sex?


  1. How often do you exercise?

  2. How often do you eat high-fat food?


  1. How often do you have fruits or leafy vegetables?


  1. Do you have your regular meals on time?


  1. How many hours of sleep do you take?


  1. Do you use any dietary products or herbal products to manage your weight?


  1. Do you feel that you get enough sleep to manage your daily life?